On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Alexander Korotkov <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > BTW, you didn't comment Tom's suggestion about dropping high-order bit which > trades minor user user confusion to minor loss of precision.
Oh, I thought I did comment on that. I favor allowing negative IDs rather than minor loss of precision. > TBH, for me it's not so important whether we allow negative queryIds or drop > high-order bit. I would be anyway very good to have 64-(or 63-)bit queryIds > committed. Great. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers