Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I've been working on SQL procedures.
No comment yet on the big picture here, but ... > The provided procedural languages (an ever more > confusing term) each needed a small touch-up to handle pg_proc entries > with prorettype == 0. Putting 0 in prorettype seems like a pretty bad idea. Why not use VOIDOID for the prorettype value? Or if there is some reason why "void" isn't the right pseudotype, maybe you should invent a new one, analogous to the "trigger" and "event_trigger" pseudotypes. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers