Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 10/31/17 14:23, Tom Lane wrote: >> Why not use VOIDOID for the prorettype value?
> We need a way to distinguish functions that are callable by SELECT and > procedures that are callable by CALL. Do procedures of this ilk belong in pg_proc at all? It seems like a large fraction of the attributes tracked in pg_proc are senseless for this purpose. A new catalog might be a better approach. In any case, I buy none of your arguments that 0 is a better choice than a new pseudotype. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers