Tom Lane wrote: > "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: >>> Actually, my gripe about this one is that it wasn't detected >>> promptly. That patch went in two weeks ago; we should have known >>> about >>> the problem >>> within a couple days at most. Seems like the Windows members of the >>> buildfarm don't run often enough. The whole point of the buildfarm >>> is to spot problems while the code is still fresh in mind, no? > >> I think that speaks for the current usage of the cygwin port. Snake >> runs native builds daily, but like Magnus and his dev box there's no >> way I'm letting Cygwin anywhere near it. Istr that the only vaguely >> active Cygwin member is Andrew's laptop. > > Well, "lack of interest" is certainly adequate reason to decommission > a port. If we can't find anyone who cares enough about Cygwin to > host a regularly-scheduled buildfarm member, I'm for blowing it off. > What all's needed on the host for this?
I might be able to use either my house machine or my work desktop here @pervasive, or one of my test boxes here @pervasive. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
