Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > Martjin, Greg, Marc, etc.: > > > >> However, I think the other suggestions of having the listbot mangle the > >> reply-tos of -patches and -committers to be -hackers would probably be > >> good too. I myself subscribe to -committers in digest form (where I > >> look at the summary to see if it's interesting) and read -patches > >> occasionally via the archives to see if anything is there... > > > > I agree that mangling the reply-tos would be the least complex (and thus > > probably best) solution. Unlike attachment stripping, this is supported by > > majordomo. > > > > However, to save on spam filtering, the reply-to should add -hackers > > *also*, > > not instead. > > You've lost me on that last point ... how does that save on spam > filtering?
He is saying that other mail servers might think our email is spam, but I think the risk is worth it. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
