Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
PLRuby is written in C.


Specifically on the matter of PL/Ruby -- and if you're trying to be such an advocate about it, you should at least spell it right -- I have never seen the author particularly active within this community, so I have my doubts whether the development processes will integrate well. In fact, shouldn't the inclusion request come from the author in the first place?

That is a good point. However in this case, it was CMD that worked with the Author to change the license, specifically for this case. I don't think the author really had any intent of submitting it until we approached him.

From a personal perspective, I do not care if we include PL/Ruby. I don't use Ruby. I am a Python guy. However I know a lot of Ruby folk that use PostgreSQL. This would be a good way to improve the native Ruby support for PostgreSQL.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




--

   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

              http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to