Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > The fact is, the existing system worked as it should, though it is often > > invisible. We didn't get all the features we wanted, but that isn't > > because the system isn't working. > > Well that kind of comes back to my point of better communication. > Perhaps a lot of this discussion could have been avoided if the TODO had > been more... proactive? > > For example: > > Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o > option is no longer needed | PeterE | Confirmed for 8.2 | 07/20/06
We could do that, but once an item is done I don't see the point in having the date and person's name. You are right that is clearly a different purpose from the TODO list, and if someone wants to track that, it might help things. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
