On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 11:18:04AM -0700, Chahine Hamila wrote: > 8.1.2 actually, which I have updated to apply to > 8.1.4. I posted a patch on the pgcluster mailing list > but I already have two significant fixes related to > pgcluster and one minor change related to the upgrade > itself. I am to use PGCluster in a real time embedded > fault-tolerant system, so I'm likely to emit a few > more patches in the way to make it more robust and > performant on some aspects. That said, my company > would feel more confortable with the idea that it's > part of the postgresql mainstream distro for many > obvious reasons - or we might drop postgresql > altogether - which is why I'm proposing myself to do
If they're that concerned, why don't they just pay for something like mammouth replicator? Or pay someone for a support contract. > the necessary work to integrate it in postgresql if > there's interest. > > It's pretty non intrusive for your average postgresql > user who won't see a difference, and very little so > for a postgresql developer. At the same time, anyone > wanting replication will have that option in standard. > It's all benefits. So, should I give it a try? >From an advocacy standpoint, I'd love to see built-in replication... but I just don't see it happening. The communities been pretty clear on this... -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
