On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:05:36PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Regardless, I think we should include a section of major new > projects/developments from pgFoundry, because they ultimately make > PostgreSQL a more useful database. Maybe this list should only be in the
I like that. "New enhancement products" or something? A -- Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now. --J.D. Baldwin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org