Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> We need different macrosand possibly functions, yes. >> I think I got enough patched at home last night to get it working with >> this, I was just too focused on one set of macros at the time. It's not >> enough to include them very late - because off_t is used in the shared >> datastructures in pg_dump/etc. It is possible to localise it to the >> pg_dump binaries, though, given some header redirection *and* given that >> we change all those off_t to pgoff_t (or similar). I couldn't find a way >> to do it without changing the off_t define. >> >> I'll try to take a look at merging these two efforts (again unless >> beaten to it, have to do some of that dreaded christmas shopping as >> well...) >> >> >> > > What is needed to test this? Just a custom dump file with a member > > 2^31 bytes?
Yeah, I believe so. It backs it up fine, but it won't restore it properly. You can create such a database with the pgbench tool and the correct scaling factor, per the original mail in this thread. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly