* Andrew Dunstan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Keep in mind it took years to get OpenSSL support up to the level we > > have it now. It took SSL experts coming in and out of our development > > process to get it 100% feature-complete. Doing this for another > > library, I am afraid, isn't trivial, unlike the above options. > > Not only that, but in every other case of an extra library, it provides us > either with more platform support (e.g. libedit) or more functionality > (e.g. dtrace). That's not the case here - we would simply be supporting > another way of getting the same functionality on platforms where we > already have a library that supports it.
As I mentioned previously there are at least some features GNUTLS has
which OpenSSL doesn't (though I don't pretend to know the level of
importance). There is also the license difference (which there *is* a
pretty clear difference in the license between the two, and some might
prefer one or the other, regardless of if there's actually a problem or
not).
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
