On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 10:56 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > All have been awaiting review for at least a month (though in one case > > the latest version is quite recent). They probably ought to be on the > > hold queue; all are ready to be reviewed for final > > application/rejection. > > > > I'd hasten to add that none of those are mine. My patches have received > > good attention, so I'm not complaining just completing admin. > > You might remember months ago that people were complaining I was pushing > things into CVS too quickly, so while the patches are in my mailbox, > they are not in the queue until I feel the community has the time to > focus on it.
I'm sorry if I explained that badly. All I meant to say was that the patches aren't on the queue for review, so could they be placed at the appropriate chronological point in the queue. (I was/am imagining the queue to be ordered in time of arrival). Patch review is, for me, harder than writing patches in the first place, so with that in mind I don't expect it to happen quickly. You've explained your on it now, so I'm patient. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
