Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> The issue is that the _hold_ patches are for patches that arrived after
> >>> feature freeze.  The patches that arrived after 8.2 was released don't
> >>> go in there because it might cause confusion.  I also have to control
> >>> how quickly I push out patches from the queue so as not to overwhelm
> >>> folks.
> >> Perhaps it would cause less confusion to name the queues for the version 
> >> they will be reviewed/applied for, rather than to toggle between queue 1 
> >> and 2, the logic of which isn't aways immediately obvious to the causal 
> >> observer.
> > 
> > I don't actually toggle.  Hold is for stuff during feature freeze. 
> But then you go back to the other one once we're through freeze is what 
> I mean.

I kind of do both at the same time until the hold queue is empty.

> > I am open to new names.
> patches-8_3 ? Anything coming in after FF then goes to patches-8_4.

The problem there is that the web site references these, so changing the
URL for every release is odd, plus right now both queues are for 8.3.

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to