Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Right, because even the decision of whether they should be in the queue
> > is a decision for us.  The hold queue additions are less stringent than
> > the main patch queue.
> Isn't that always the case though, not just after FF when the hold queue
> starts getting activity again? That would imply the need to a permanent
> triage(?) queue, and a version specific one imho.

The hold queue is not used during normal development. I don't see value
in a triage queue.

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to