Dave Page wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Right, because even the decision of whether they should be in the queue > > is a decision for us. The hold queue additions are less stringent than > > the main patch queue. > > Isn't that always the case though, not just after FF when the hold queue > starts getting activity again? That would imply the need to a permanent > triage(?) queue, and a version specific one imho.
The hold queue is not used during normal development. I don't see value in a triage queue. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
