"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Also, for completeness, the causes I wrote off as not interesting
> (anymore, in some cases):
>  missing BYTE_ORDER definition for Solaris                            | 
> 2007-01-10 14:18:23 |     1

What is this BYTE_ORDER macro? Should I be using it instead of the
AC_C_BIGENDIAN test in configure for the packed varlena patch?

>  row-ordering discrepancy in rowtypes test                            | 
> 2007-02-10 03:00:02 |     3

Is this because the test is fixed or unfixable? If not shouldn't the test get
an ORDER BY clause so that it will reliably pass on future versions? 

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to