> Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would like to propose adding new character set "JIS X
> > 0213"(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JIS_X_0213).
> > ...
> > Note that since encoding schema of EUC_JIS_2004 is exactly identical
> > to EUC_JP, we can reuse existing encoding routines defined in
> > utls/mb/*.c.
> I'm confused.  If this is exactly the same as EUC_JP, why do we need
> any new code at all?  Why not just a documentation addition saying
> they are the same thing?  Or maybe rename EUC_JP to reflect the new
> standard number (we've certainly renamed encodings before).

I said *encoding schema" is same, not the contents (character set) is
same. In another word, characters included in EUC_JP are not same as

Also, EUC_JIS_2004 is *not* the super set of EUC_JP. So we need to let
EUC_JP and EUC_JIS_2004 coexist.
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to