Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm confused.  If this is exactly the same as EUC_JP, why do we need
>> any new code at all?

> I said *encoding schema" is same, not the contents (character set) is
> same. In another word, characters included in EUC_JP are not same as
> EUC_JIS_2004.

I'm still confused.  If the set of characters is different, then surely
we need at least a different UTF8<->EUC_JIS_2004 conversion function?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at


Reply via email to