"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You keep saying that but I think it's wrong. There are trivial patches that
>> were submitted last year that are still sitting in the queue.
> Um ... which ones exactly?  I don't see *anything* in the current queue
> that is utterly without issues

I didn't mean they were without issues. Only that they weren't complex patches
requiring broad knowledge of many parts of the system.

Anyways, I think we're well on our way to improving the situation so I don't
want to drag out my negativity any longer.

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to