Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm. I'm not sure, but that may have been a case where it was generally
> decided that the spec was somewhat braindead in this fashion (it seems
> so in my personal view of this, honestly...). To issue a revoke and
> have it not work would be kind of concerning. If we do end up following
> this path we should emit a warning (at least...) if the user still has
> the rights which are being revoked, even if through someone else.
That's not how it works for rights on ordinary objects.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
