Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm.  I'm not sure, but that may have been a case where it was generally
> decided that the spec was somewhat braindead in this fashion (it seems
> so in my personal view of this, honestly...).  To issue a revoke and
> have it not work would be kind of concerning.  If we do end up following
> this path we should emit a warning (at least...) if the user still has
> the rights which are being revoked, even if through someone else.

That's not how it works for rights on ordinary objects.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to