Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I will say publicly what I have said to others privately. Forgive me if > I'm a bit blunter than usual. I do not see any value in this at all. > What we need to track are problems to be solved, be they bugs or > features, not particular patches. Tracking patches simply comes too late > in the process. > > I think that your attitude to the use of bug/feature trackers is quite > unreasonable, and certainly in opposition to what seems to be the > majority opinion among developers. It's a great pity that you are so > utterly resistant to use of tracking software. The only reason that this > system, at best a half measure in almost everyone's eyes, is being > proposed, as far as I can see, is that you will not agree to use > anything else. > > So if this goes ahead and proves to be of little value, I hope that you > will relent and agree the use of proper tracking software like almost > every other open source project uses. It really is time that PostgreSQL > managed to advance beyond thinking that email lists are the greatest > management tool since sliced bread. It's just indefensible in 2007.
As I said before, I am involved in patches only when a patch isn't addressed. If a new system works, I will have nothing to do, which is good. If you want me to believe it will work better than what we do now, I can't. Prove me wrong. Forget about what I think. Do something and stop talking about it. What I am not going to do is to do 2x more work and get 2% more help, which is what I fear. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
