Bruce Momjian wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 14:29 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Tom Lane wrote:

untrustworthy disk hardware, for instance.  I'd much rather use names
derived from "deferred commit" or "delayed commit" or some such.
Honestly, I prefer these names as well as it seems directly related versus
transaction guarantee which sounds to be more like us saying, if we turn it off
our transactions are bogus.
That was the intention..., but name change accepted.

Hm, another possibility: "synchronous_commit = off"
Ooo, I like that. Any other takers?

Yea, I like that too but I am now realizing that we are not really
deferring or delaying the "COMMIT" command but rather the recovery of
the commit.  GUC as full_commit_recovery?

recovery is a bad word I think. It is related too closely to failure.


Joshua D. Drake


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to