-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:42:19PM +0200, Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote:
>> the problem here is that vendors of appliances don't want people to
>> spider their codes. this is a fact - it is not the idea of open
>> source to do so but bloody reality. in addition to that people are
>> not willing to code everything in C just to hide.
> Well, then, they're out of luck.
This whole thread can be summed up as: plpgsql is an interpretive
language, not a compiled on.
You can and do see the source, just like perl, ruby, python, bash etc...
If you don't like it, don't use it and use C instead.
Keep in mind that the obfuscation techniques that can be used by python
and perl are all reversible.
Joshua D. Drake
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at