Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dang, me again eh? :-) > Well, I'm available now and tomorrow to do any further work required.
Looking back at your original discussion of the bug, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00234.php I'm wondering why you chose option #3 rather than option #4? I still find the proposed patch a bit crufty. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
