On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 12:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > Looking back at your original discussion of the bug, > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00234.php > > I'm wondering why you chose option #3 rather than option #4? > > I still find the proposed patch a bit crufty. > > In particular, it seems like a patch per #4 would be a one-liner:
Yes, thats my understanding too. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
