Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
> > What we should to do is to prevent such things happening in the future,
> > rather than reverting this patch and delaying replication issues.
> >
> >
> >   
> The next time the same sort of argument will be made. The way to prevent 
> it in future is not to allow it now.
> One of the things that people seem to fail to appreciate is that it 
> really looks very bad for us when an insider does this. The message we 
> send to non-insiders is just dreadful. If we want to encourage people to 
> participate in development then we should all play by the same rules. 
> One of the things I have found most attractive about the PostgreSQL 
> community, quite apart from the technical excellence of our product, is 
> the community's openness, fairness and egalitarianism. And I know I'm 
> not alone in that. We should guard those qualities jealously.

Andrew is right that the appearance here is the biggest problem, and I
already emailed that to Jan privately.

  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to