Gregory Stark wrote: > "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I wrote: > >> Maybe "aword", "word", and "numword"? > > > > Does the lack of response mean people are satisfied with that? > > Sorry, I had a couple responses partially written but never finished. > > If we were doing it from scratch I would suggest using longer names. At the > least I would still suggest using "ascii" or "asciiword" instead of "aword".
+1 for asciiword; "aword" sounds too much like "a word" which is not the meaning I think we're trying to convey. It is a bit longer, but there are longer names already so I don't think it's a problem. (It's not like it's something anyone needs to type often). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/ "En el principio del tiempo era el desencanto. Y era la desolación. Y era grande el escándalo, y el destello de monitores y el crujir de teclas." ("Sean los Pájaros Pulentios", Daniel Correa) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
