Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> If we were doing it from scratch I would suggest using longer names. At the
>> least I would still suggest using "ascii" or "asciiword" instead of "aword".
> +1 for asciiword; "aword" sounds too much like "a word" which is not the
> meaning I think we're trying to convey.
OK, so with that and Michael's suggestion we have
asciiword
word
numword
asciihword
hword
numhword
hword_asciipart
hword_part
hword_numpart
Sold?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
