On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:45:14 -0400
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > We develop and commit like normal *until* the community feels there
> > is enough for release. Then we announce a feature freeze.
> >
> >   
> No, I think this is hopeless on several grounds. First, it increases 
> uncertainty. People need to be able to work towards a target. Second, 
> there will always be a temptation to "just squeeze in killer feature
> X".

Well that flows into that checkpoint idea I think.

> I think there is some virtue in Simon's suggestion, provided that 
> adequate reviewer resources are available. That might mean you need
> to put on your fundraising hat and raise some reviewer sponsorship
> money.

Did someone say money? ;)


Joshua D. Drake

> cheers
> andrew


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
                        UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to