On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:56:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I'd rather encourage people to work in an incremental, not-so-big-bang > fashion. Obviously one of the requirements for that will be quicker > review turnaround and commit, so that there's time to build on a > previous patch...
From my outsider point of view the big difference is that the probablility of $RANDOM_PATCH being reviewed during features freeze is very much greater than at any other time. So the best way to get a patch completed is to post it sometime before FF and after FF use the subsequent feedback to improve it. If we can fix the disparity I think most of the problems will go away... Ofcourse, posting just prior FF doesn't help, but I think that's a chicken/egg problem. People do what works. Have a ncie day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
Description: Digital signature