Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mind you, I'm in favor of one.  A new SCM would make some other development 
> tasks easier. However, I'm reluctant to open the can-of-worms which is the 
> "what SCM should we use" discussion again, and complicate something which 
> we seem to have consensus on.

As near as I can tell, the arguments for a new SCM mostly apply to work
which individual developers are doing outside the main tree.  So, given
the existence of stuff like git-cvsimport, I don't see a strong reason
why anyone who wants to work that way can't already sync the core CVS
with a local SCM-of-their-choice and get on with it.

You're right that this is utterly unrelated to the scheduling question,

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to