Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, 32 made a significant difference as I recall ... do you still have 
> the figures for that, Jignesh?

I'd want to see a new set of test runs backing up any call for a change
in NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS --- we've changed enough stuff around this area that
benchmarks using code from a few months back shouldn't carry a lot of

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to