Joseph Shraibman writes: > Right. And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy the ant files >to use > it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+
Couldn't the JDBC 3 stuff be implemented in the JDBC 2 driver as extension? The only reason we have a jdbc1 vs jdbc2 split is so that we can use jdk 1.2 functionality for the implementation of the JDBC 2 driver. So unless there is something in jdk 1.3 or 1.4 that is required or really useful for JDBC 3 we could probably avoid opening up yet another directory that always gets out of sync. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
