Ok, what specifically in jdbc 3.0 do people want implemented? All of the callable statement stuff is not applicable to postgres
Dave -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Barry Lind Sent: October 17, 2001 12:53 AM To: Joseph Shraibman Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches Anyone can do that by submitting a patch. I don't see anything special that needs to be done. --Barry Joseph Shraibman wrote: > Right. And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy > the > ant files to use it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+ > > > Dave Cramer wrote: > >> What do you see wrong with the build process? >> >> Ant is used to build the driver! >> >> Dave >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joseph >> Shraibman >> Sent: October 16, 2001 5:45 PM >> To: Rene Pijlman >> Cc: Mark Lillywhite (pg-jdbc); [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches >> >> >> I think what most needs to be done is for someone to update the build >> process, so people who want to hack code will have somewhere to start >> from. >> >> Rene Pijlman wrote: >> >> >>> On 13 Oct 2001 11:16:07 +1000, you wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I was just wondering if anyone is working on support for JDK1.4 for >>>> the postgresql drivers. >>>> >>>> >>> Not AFAIK. >>> >>> >>> >>>> It appears that there are some new methods defined >>>> in a few interfaces that need to be implemented (presumably to just >>>> throw the "unimplemented" exception?). >>>> >>>> >>> Do you mean JDBC 3.0 methods? What methods precisely? Are they >>> implementable? >>> >>> >>> >>>> Also, I have a patch for DatabaseMetaData to fix a bug in the >>>> metadata >>>> >> >>>> returned for BigDecimals. I have already tried to submit this patch >>>> 2 or 3 times (to peter@retep) but never heard back. It's only about >>>> 4 LOC but it makes introspecting the database much better. >>>> >>>> Is this the place to post a patch, and if I do, am I likely to get >>>> a >>>> response? >>>> >>>> >>> You can send patches to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, >>> preferably with a CC to this list. Yes, you will get a response. >>> Usually, a patch is applied within a week (if the patch is good, of >>> course). >>> >>> If a patch to the JDBC driver needs discussion first, that should be >>> on this list. >>> >>> Regards, >>> René Pijlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> ---------------------------(end of >>> broadcast)--------------------------- >>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >>> >>> >> >> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
