Peter, Yes, that makes a lot of sense. One problem might exist with the sql.Types
Jdk 1.4 probably defines extra types which won't be defined in jdk 1.3. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: October 18, 2001 1:41 PM To: Joseph Shraibman Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches Joseph Shraibman writes: > Right. And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy > the ant files to use it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+ Couldn't the JDBC 3 stuff be implemented in the JDBC 2 driver as extension? The only reason we have a jdbc1 vs jdbc2 split is so that we can use jdk 1.2 functionality for the implementation of the JDBC 2 driver. So unless there is something in jdk 1.3 or 1.4 that is required or really useful for JDBC 3 we could probably avoid opening up yet another directory that always gets out of sync. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]