* Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Specifically, if we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my 
| > objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) goes 
| > away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other 
| > reasons you mention.
| Works for me. As I mentioned in my last email, I'm easy about this one.  As
| long as I can build it in Linux/UNIX, I'm happy.  Its an added benefit to
| the postgresql community that it can be built on Windows and Mac.  

If we can include ant binaries that would be the best I agree. The Apache 
license shouldn't cause any trouble here, but mayve the size would ? What 
is the minimum required size of the Ant binaries anyway ?



Gunnar Rønning - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to