Tom Lane writes:

> "Ron Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Would it be useful if I added a 'datestyle' of 'ISO basic' which
> > would produce the most terse formats ('19980115' for dates,
> > and 'P1Y1M' for intervals)?
> I don't really care for using that name for it --- for one thing, you
> couldn't do
>       set datestyle to iso basic;
> because of syntax limitations.  A one-word name is a much better idea.


Keep in mind that SQL itself is also a kind of ISO, so being more specific
is useful.

Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to