Tom Lane writes: > "Ron Mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Would it be useful if I added a 'datestyle' of 'ISO basic' which > > would produce the most terse formats ('19980115' for dates, > > and 'P1Y1M' for intervals)? > > I don't really care for using that name for it --- for one thing, you > couldn't do > set datestyle to iso basic; > because of syntax limitations. A one-word name is a much better idea.
iso8601 Keep in mind that SQL itself is also a kind of ISO, so being more specific is useful. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly