Tom wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane writes: > >> Yes, but by the same token "iso8601" isn't specific enough either.
ISO 8601 gives more specific names. ISO 8601 Basic Format: P2Y10M15DT10H20M30S ISO 8601 Alternative Format: P00021015T102030 ISO 8601 Extended Format: P0002-10-15T10:20:30 In a way, the Extended Format is kinda nice, since it�s almost human readable. I could put in both the basic and extended ones, and call the dateformats �iso8601basic� and �iso8601extended�. The negative is that to do �iso8601basic� right, I�d also have to tweak the �date� and �time� parts of the code too. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
