Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> I don't really care for using that name for it ---

> iso8601

> Keep in mind that SQL itself is also a kind of ISO, so being more specific
> is useful.

Yes, but by the same token "iso8601" isn't specific enough either.
Several of the other input formats we support have at least as good a
claim on that name.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to