Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My guess is that this used to proc_exit the postgres backend, but now
> proc_exits the postmaster, but that is only a guess.
No. This is post-fork (and had better remain so). The change causes
the sub-postmaster that has just finished handling a cancel request
to exit with nonzero status, which the postmaster then interprets
(correctly) as a child process crash.
BTW, how are we going to do cancels in Windows-land? The sub-postmaster
isn't gonna have access to the postmaster's list of child PIDs and
cancel keys ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
