Claudio Natoli wrote: > > Tom Lane writes: > > Actually, on further reflection a separate array to store PIDs and > cancel keys is probably a better idea. > [snip] > > I still think it's unnecessary to make a separate shmem segment for it, > though. > > Why is that? Don't we need the backends to have access to it to do a cancel > request? I think I've missed something here...
I think they are saying put the cancel key inside the existing shared memory segment. I don't know when we actually attach to the main shared memory sigment in the child, but it would have to be sooner than when we need the cancel key. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
