On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 22:29, Gavin Sherry wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> Oh, and it doesn't handle WAL. Tom mentioned/agreed that btree's method of > dumping whole pages into WAL would be the best/most efficient way to > journaling this and that the btree code should be generalised. I haven't > had time to look at this yet. > Not sure whether it is really desirable that it does. Could be some damn big tablespaces moved and do we really want all of that in the log? I think we can leave it for now, maybe add a "dont log" option later, and then change the default to logging. Best Regards, Simon Riggs ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
