Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Please remove that; if I thought either one was a good idea, I would
> > have allowed it in the committed patch.
> > 
> > Sequences are too small to be worth moving around, and may someday be
> > reimplemented in a fashion that doesn't use up a separate disk file for
> > each one.  If we allow SET TABLESPACE on them we will be limiting our
> > future flexibility for no useful gain.
> Why do we allow them to be created in tablespaces in the first place 
> then?  Seems like a bit of a misfeature?  I mean we don't allow views in 
> tablespaces...

True, that does seem unusual.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to