Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Please remove that; if I thought either one was a good idea, I would > > have allowed it in the committed patch. > > > > Sequences are too small to be worth moving around, and may someday be > > reimplemented in a fashion that doesn't use up a separate disk file for > > each one. If we allow SET TABLESPACE on them we will be limiting our > > future flexibility for no useful gain. > > Why do we allow them to be created in tablespaces in the first place > then? Seems like a bit of a misfeature? I mean we don't allow views in > tablespaces...
Advertising
True, that does seem unusual. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
