Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:16:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There seems to be a distinct lack of unanimity about that judgment ;-)
Advertising
> Well, yes, _across Postgres hackers_. But if we were to ask
> pgsql-general I have a feeling we would measure more weight on one side.
Yeah, but which side ;-) ? I think the pg-general population would have
a very much higher fraction of people who have no user-defined functions
and therefore would see no value in \df not showing system functions.
If we put in a config variable, that at least lowers the stakes for the
losing side in the argument about what the default should be. Without
that, I think there will be some serious flamewars ahead...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
