Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:16:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> There seems to be a distinct lack of unanimity about that judgment ;-)
> Well, yes, _across Postgres hackers_. But if we were to ask > pgsql-general I have a feeling we would measure more weight on one side. Yeah, but which side ;-) ? I think the pg-general population would have a very much higher fraction of people who have no user-defined functions and therefore would see no value in \df not showing system functions. If we put in a config variable, that at least lowers the stakes for the losing side in the argument about what the default should be. Without that, I think there will be some serious flamewars ahead... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly