Gregory Stark wrote: > >> Did Greg push a version which didn't carry the "WIP" label to it? As > >> far as I remember he was still asking how to make the Sort and Limit > >> nodes communicate. > > > > Good question. I asked for a new version of this patch and the WIP was > > only in the email subject line. Greg, is this ready for review? > Well my question was whether it was acceptable to do things this way or > whether there was a better way. If it's the right way then sure, if not then > no. I guess that's what review is for. > In short I'm not sure what constitutes "ready for review". Are you asking if > it's ready to apply? I don't know, that's why we have reviews. Or are you > asking if it's ready for someone to look at? What's the point of posting WIP > patches if you don't want someone to look at it?
I am asking if _you_ are done working on it. Seems you are, so I will add it to the patch queue. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
