Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Are we in beta or not? To me, beta means nothing but bug fixes go in, >> period. No ifs, no buts, no maybes, no exceptions. And that should >> definitely go for contrib as well. We need a bit of self-discipline around >> here.
> the original intention was to have text search companion with code examples > for dictionaries and parser API and ability to keep them in workable > condition, instead of having them in SGML documentation. Yes. I think that we can justify new contrib code here as a documentation bug fix: right now, the examples in sections 12.9 and 12.10 are wrong (obsolete), impossible to maintain (which is why they're obsolete; they failed to track code changes), and not in a format that's directly useful as a template for new code. However, the dict_regex code is not ready for a number of reasons, quite aside from the question of whether we want to add a dependency. I concur with the idea of dropping it for now. I'm a bit inclined to drop dict_roman as well, as it seems of questionable real use, and code-example-wise it adds nothing over dict_intdict. That would leave us with two dictionary examples and one parser example, and I think both of the dictionaries look useful enough to be worth keeping. (In particular I'd not vote for having only dict_intdict since it does not illustrate how to use a config file ... and we surely don't want to encourage people to not do that correctly.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly