Hi, On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > NikhilS wrote: > >> Thanks for taking a look. But if I am not mistaken Gavin and co. are > working > >> on a much exhaustive proposal. In light of that maybe this patch might > not > >> be needed in the first place? > >> > >> I will wait for discussion and a subsequent collective consensus here, > >> before deciding the further course of actions. > > > I think it is unwise to wait on Gavin for a more complex implemention > > --- we might end up with nothing for 8.4. As long as your syntax is > > compatible with whatever Gavin proposed Gavin can add on to your patch > > once it is applied. > > It would be equally unwise to apply a stopgap patch if we're not certain > it will be upward compatible with what we want to do later. > > I haven't been through the partitioning threads at all yet, but I think > what we probably want to have when we emerge from commit fest is some > consensus on what the road map is for partitioning. > +2 Regards, Nikhils -- EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
