-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:55:45 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I actualized sql/psm patch. This patch can be downloaded from > > http://www.pgsql.cz/patches/plpgpsm.diff.gz > > The fundamental problem I've got with this patch is that it adds 400K > of new code (and that's just the code, not counting documentation or > regression tests) that we'll have to maintain, to obtain a feature > that so far as I've heard there is precisely zero demand for. That is likely because everyone knew he was working on it. Consider this my +1 for pl/psm support. > > The duplicativeness of the code with plpgsql doesn't make this > prospect any more pleasant, either. However, I do agree with you here. I would much prefer it be cleaned up into its own space. > > The idea would be a lot easier to swallow if the code were refactored > to avoid the duplication with plpgsql. +1. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH9EIYATb/zqfZUUQRAmkiAJ9Q5s2Lsit7lW60sczr1/wxEGX2LACdH2rl 079G3tiL/Jj+B7FU6G5e65c= =nnba -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
