Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ...  I suspect anyone wanting to migrate 
> > their existing SQL/PSM stuff to Postgres will be less than impressed by 
> > our "function body as a string" mechanism.
> Yeah, that's the other little problem with claiming standards-compliance
> as a reason for doing this.  We'd really have to suck it up and figure
> some other way of parsing function bodies.

Oh, I understand now, that we aren't going to be 100% standards
compliant based on how we quote our function bodies --- I understand
Andrew's point now.

  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to