Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ... I suspect anyone wanting to migrate > > their existing SQL/PSM stuff to Postgres will be less than impressed by > > our "function body as a string" mechanism. > > Yeah, that's the other little problem with claiming standards-compliance > as a reason for doing this. We'd really have to suck it up and figure > some other way of parsing function bodies.
Oh, I understand now, that we aren't going to be 100% standards compliant based on how we quote our function bodies --- I understand Andrew's point now. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
