Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ... I suspect anyone wanting to migrate
> > their existing SQL/PSM stuff to Postgres will be less than impressed by
> > our "function body as a string" mechanism.
> Yeah, that's the other little problem with claiming standards-compliance
> as a reason for doing this. We'd really have to suck it up and figure
> some other way of parsing function bodies.
Oh, I understand now, that we aren't going to be 100% standards
compliant based on how we quote our function bodies --- I understand
Andrew's point now.
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: