Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The fundamental problem I've got with this patch is that it adds 400K
of new code (and that's just the code, not counting documentation or
regression tests) that we'll have to maintain, to obtain a feature that
so far as I've heard there is precisely zero demand for.
We have a customer that wants to use it as part of a MySQL-to-Postgres
Using an implementation like this? I suspect anyone wanting to migrate
their existing SQL/PSM stuff to Postgres will be less than impressed by
our "function body as a string" mechanism.
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: