Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:19 -0700, Martin Zaun wrote:
>> reviewing your patch 

> Current status is this:
> * My understanding is that Dave and Andrew (and therefore Simon) think
> the approach proposed here is an acceptable one. Heikki disagrees and
> wants different approach. Perhaps I misunderstand.
> * Patch needs work to complete the proposed approach
> * I'm willing to change the patch, but not able to test it on Windows.

I thought the latest conclusion was that changing the behavior of
pg_standby itself wouldn't address the problem anyway, and that what we
need is just a docs patch recommending that people use safe copying
methods in their scripts that copy to the archive area?

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to